🔗 Share this article

The UN Security Council has approved a American-supported resolution that favors Moroccan claim regarding the disputed Western Sahara, despite strong opposition from Algeria.

Divided Vote Strengthens Moroccan Position

Although the recent vote was split, the resolution represents the most significant endorsement yet for Moroccan proposal to maintain sovereignty over the region, which additionally enjoys backing from the majority of European Union countries and a growing number of African nation partners.

Measure Structure and Key Elements

The resolution refers to Moroccan proposal as a basis for talks. As with previous resolutions, the text makes no mention of a referendum on independence that contains sovereignty as an option, which constitutes the approach traditionally favored by the pro-independence Polisario movement and its supporters.

Real self-rule under Moroccan sovereignty could represent a most feasible solution.

Background Information

The territory is a mineral-rich stretch of coastline desert the size of a US state which was under Spain's rule until the mid-1970s. It is claimed by both Morocco and the Polisario Front, which functions from temporary settlements in southwestern neighboring Algeria and asserts to speak for the indigenous people native to the disputed territory.

Decision Results and Global Responses

The United States, which proposed the resolution, led eleven countries in deciding in favor, while three countries – Russia, China and Pakistan – declined to vote. Algeria, Polisario's main supporter, did not vote.

Mike Waltz, the American ambassador to the UN, stated the decision had been "historic" and would "advance the progress for a long, long overdue peace in Western Sahara".

Amar Bendjama, the Algeria's representative to the UN, said that while the measure was an advancement on previous iterations, it "contains a series of deficiencies".

Security Mission and Upcoming Assessment

The resolution also renews the UN peacekeeping mission in the territory for another year, as has been done for more than three decades. Previous extensions, however, have not contained a mention to Morocco and its allies' favored resolution.

The measure urges all parties involved to "seize this unique opportunity for a lasting peace." Based on progress, it requests the secretary general to review the operation's authority within six months.

Area Consequences and Present Situation

The change could disrupt a protracted situation that for decades has eluded resolution, desdespite a UN security mission that was intended to be short-term. Demonstrations have followed in indigenous refugee camps in the neighboring country this week, where people have vowed not to abandon their fight for self-determination.

Morocco controls nearly all of the territory, except for a narrow area called the "liberated area" that lies to the east of a Moroccan-built sand wall.

Historical Background and Recent Events

A 1991 truce was intended to pave the way for a vote on independence, but disagreements over voter eligibility prevented it from taking place.

Over the years, the Moroccan government has developed the contested territory, building a maritime facility and a long highway. Government support keep basic commodity prices affordable, and the population has grown significantly as Moroccans establish homes in cities such as Dakhla and Laayoune.

The movement withdrew from the truce in 2020 after clashes near a route Morocco was constructing to Mauritania.

The movement has since regularly reported military activity, while Morocco has mostly rejected claims of open conflict. The UN calls it "low-level hostilities".

International Relations and Future Possibilities

Reacting to the proposed measure, Polisario said that it would not participate in any process aiming "to validate Morocco's illegal presence," adding peace "can never be achieved by supporting territorial claims".

The situation constitutes the central issue in north African international relations. Morocco views support for its autonomy plan as a benchmark for how it assesses its international partners.

Last October, the UN representative suggested partitioning Western Sahara, a proposal neither side accepted. He urged the government to specify what autonomy would entail and cautioned that a lack of development might question the United Nations' role and "if there remains opportunity and willingness for us to remain effective."

The push to reassess the United Nations Mission comes as the United States reduces financial support for UN programmes and organizations, including security operations.